Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: udp: fix seen-reply test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:37:21PM +0200, Roi Dayan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23/01/2023 18:16, Roi Dayan wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 23/01/2023 14:04, Florian Westphal wrote:
> >> IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT is only useful for test_bit() api.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 4883ec512c17 ("netfilter: conntrack: avoid reload of ct->status")
> >> Reported-by: Roi Dayan <roid@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
> >> index 6b9206635b24..0030fbe8885c 100644
> >> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
> >> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
> >> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_udp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
> >>  	/* If we've seen traffic both ways, this is some kind of UDP
> >>  	 * stream. Set Assured.
> >>  	 */
> >> -	if (status & IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT) {
> >> +	if (status & IPS_SEEN_REPLY) {
> >>  		unsigned long extra = timeouts[UDP_CT_UNREPLIED];
> >>  		bool stream = false;
> >>  
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > thanks
> 
> hi, just pinging. when is this fix going to be merged?

I'll take care of this.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux