On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:35:00 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote: > > In fact we could easily just have three extra types NLA_BE16, NLA_BE32 > > and NLA_BE64 types without even stealing a bit? > > Sure, I can make a patch if there is consensus that new types are the > way to go. The NLA_BE* idea seems appealing, but if the implementation gets tedious either way works for me.
