10/12/2022 1:06 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
On 12/10/2022 10:37, Konstantin Meskhidze (A) wrote:
9/6/2022 11:07 AM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
Good to see such clean commit!
On 29/08/2022 19:03, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
Adds a new landlock_key union and landlock_id structure to support
a socket port rule type. Refactors landlock_insert_rule() and
landlock_find_rule() to support coming network modifications.
This patch also adds is_object_pointer() and get_root() helpers.
Please explain a bit what these helpers do.
Now adding or searching a rule in a ruleset depends on a landlock id
argument provided in refactored functions mentioned above.
More explanation:
A struct landlock_id identifies a unique entry in a ruleset: either a
kernel object (e.g inode) or a typed data (e.g. TCP port). There is one
red-black tree per key type.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
Because most changes come from
https://git.kernel.org/mic/c/8f4104b3dc59e7f110c9b83cdf034d010a2d006f
and
https://git.kernel.org/mic/c/7d6cf40a6f81adf607ad3cc17aaa11e256beeea4
you can append
Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Do I need to add Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
and Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> or just
Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> ????
Cause Submiting patches article says:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
"...Since Co-developed-by: denotes authorship, every Co-developed-by:
must be immediately followed by a Signed-off-by: of the associated
co-author...."
Is this correct signing for this patch:
Co-developed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
Because I'll merge your patches in my tree, I'll add my Signed-off-by to
all patches. You can then just add Co-developed-by after your
Signed-off-by for this one and I'll add the rest.
Ok. I got it. Thanks for the explaning.
.
