On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:47:52PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:39:08PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c > > > index 8970d0b4faeb..1d7e520d9966 100644 > > > --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c > > > +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c > > > @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ static int nft_fib6_flowi_init(struct flowi6 *fl6, const struct nft_fib *priv, > > > if (ipv6_addr_type(&fl6->daddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL) { > > > lookup_flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE; > > > fl6->flowi6_oif = get_ifindex(dev ? dev : pkt->skb->dev); > > > + } else if ((priv->flags & NFTA_FIB_F_IIF) && > > > + (netif_is_l3_master(dev) || netif_is_l3_slave(dev))) { > > > + fl6->flowi6_oif = dev->ifindex; > > > } > > > > I'm not very familiar with nft code, but it seems dev can be NULL here, > > so netif_is_l3_master() can dereference a NULL pointer. > > No, this should never be NULL, NFTA_FIB_F_IIF is restricted to > input/prerouting chains. Thanks, I didn't realise that. > > Shouldn't we test dev in the 'else if' condition? > > We could do that in case it makes review easier. Then if it's just to help reviewers, a small comment should be enough.