Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:39:08PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
> > index 8970d0b4faeb..1d7e520d9966 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
> > @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ static int nft_fib6_flowi_init(struct flowi6 *fl6, const struct nft_fib *priv,
> > if (ipv6_addr_type(&fl6->daddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL) {
> > lookup_flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE;
> > fl6->flowi6_oif = get_ifindex(dev ? dev : pkt->skb->dev);
> > + } else if ((priv->flags & NFTA_FIB_F_IIF) &&
> > + (netif_is_l3_master(dev) || netif_is_l3_slave(dev))) {
> > + fl6->flowi6_oif = dev->ifindex;
> > }
>
> I'm not very familiar with nft code, but it seems dev can be NULL here,
> so netif_is_l3_master() can dereference a NULL pointer.
No, this should never be NULL, NFTA_FIB_F_IIF is restricted to
input/prerouting chains.
> Shouldn't we test dev in the 'else if' condition?
We could do that in case it makes review easier.
