Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote: > The function nft_meta_set_to_target() would always bail since nothing > sets 'sreg->meta_sreg.set' to true. This is obvious, as the immediate > expression "filling" the source register does not indicate its purpose. Hmm, is there a missing test case? I did not see any failures. > The whole source register purpose storing in meta_sreg seems to be > pointless, so drop it altogether. Yes; from iptables perspective a 'meta set' operation has to be mapped to a target, so there is no need to store this for subsequent consumption.
