On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:44:05PM -0700, Justin Stitt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 2:04 AM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 12:17:45PM -0700, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c b/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
> > > index 459d0696c91a..5d74abffc94f 100644
> > > --- a/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
> > > +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
> > > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ tproxy_tg6_v1(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
> > > targets on the same rule yet */
> > > skb->mark = (skb->mark & ~tgi->mark_mask) ^ tgi->mark_value;
> > >
> > > - pr_debug("redirecting: proto %hhu %pI6:%hu -> %pI6:%hu, mark: %x\n",
> > > + pr_debug("redirecting: proto %d %pI6:%hu -> %pI6:%hu, mark: %x\n",
> > > tproto, &iph->saddr, ntohs(hp->source),
> > > laddr, ntohs(lport), skb->mark);
> > >
> > > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ tproxy_tg6_v1(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
> > > return NF_ACCEPT;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - pr_debug("no socket, dropping: proto %hhu %pI6:%hu -> %pI6:%hu, mark: %x\n",
> > > + pr_debug("no socket, dropping: proto %d %pI6:%hu -> %pI6:%hu, mark: %x\n",
> > > tproto, &iph->saddr, ntohs(hp->source),
> > > &iph->daddr, ntohs(hp->dest), skb->mark);
> >
> > Could you instead send a patch to remove these pr_debug calls?
>
> Do you mean all Instances of pr_debug in `xt_TPROXY.c` (of which there
> are six) or just these two specific cases @ +169 and +177.
Yes, remove all pr_debug instances, thanks.
