On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 12:17:45PM -0700, Justin Stitt wrote:
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c b/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
> index 459d0696c91a..5d74abffc94f 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_TPROXY.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ tproxy_tg6_v1(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
> targets on the same rule yet */
> skb->mark = (skb->mark & ~tgi->mark_mask) ^ tgi->mark_value;
>
> - pr_debug("redirecting: proto %hhu %pI6:%hu -> %pI6:%hu, mark: %x\n",
> + pr_debug("redirecting: proto %d %pI6:%hu -> %pI6:%hu, mark: %x\n",
> tproto, &iph->saddr, ntohs(hp->source),
> laddr, ntohs(lport), skb->mark);
>
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ tproxy_tg6_v1(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
> return NF_ACCEPT;
> }
>
> - pr_debug("no socket, dropping: proto %hhu %pI6:%hu -> %pI6:%hu, mark: %x\n",
> + pr_debug("no socket, dropping: proto %d %pI6:%hu -> %pI6:%hu, mark: %x\n",
> tproto, &iph->saddr, ntohs(hp->source),
> &iph->daddr, ntohs(hp->dest), skb->mark);
Could you instead send a patch to remove these pr_debug calls?
Thanks.
