Re: [RFC PATCH v4 01/15] landlock: access mask renaming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





4/1/2022 7:47 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:

On 09/03/2022 14:44, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
Currently Landlock supports filesystem
restrictions. To support network type rules,
this modification extends and renames
ruleset's access masks.

Please use 72 columns for all commit messages.
With vim: set tw=72

The code looks good but you'll have to rebase it on top of my access_mask_t changes.

Next time you can rebase your changes on my landlock-wip branch at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mic/linux.git I'll update this branch regularly but it should not impact much your changes.

  Sure. I will rebase it on your latest updates. Thanks.


Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes since v3:
* Split commit.

---
  security/landlock/fs.c       |  4 ++--
  security/landlock/ruleset.c  | 18 +++++++++---------
  security/landlock/ruleset.h  |  8 ++++----
  security/landlock/syscalls.c |  6 +++---
  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
index 97b8e421f617..d727bdab7840 100644
--- a/security/landlock/fs.c
+++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int landlock_append_fs_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
          return -EINVAL;

      /* Transforms relative access rights to absolute ones. */
-    access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS & ~ruleset->fs_access_masks[0]; +    access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS & ~ruleset->access_masks[0];
      object = get_inode_object(d_backing_inode(path->dentry));
      if (IS_ERR(object))
          return PTR_ERR(object);
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
      /* Saves all layers handling a subset of requested accesses. */
      layer_mask = 0;
      for (i = 0; i < domain->num_layers; i++) {
-        if (domain->fs_access_masks[i] & access_request)
+        if (domain->access_masks[i] & access_request)
              layer_mask |= BIT_ULL(i);
      }
      /* An access request not handled by the domain is allowed. */
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
index ec72b9262bf3..78341a0538de 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
  {
      struct landlock_ruleset *new_ruleset;

-    new_ruleset = kzalloc(struct_size(new_ruleset, fs_access_masks,
+    new_ruleset = kzalloc(struct_size(new_ruleset, access_masks,
                  num_layers), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
      if (!new_ruleset)
          return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -39,21 +39,21 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
      /*
       * hierarchy = NULL
       * num_rules = 0
-     * fs_access_masks[] = 0
+     * access_masks[] = 0
       */
      return new_ruleset;
  }

-struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 fs_access_mask)
+struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 access_mask)
  {
      struct landlock_ruleset *new_ruleset;

      /* Informs about useless ruleset. */
-    if (!fs_access_mask)
+    if (!access_mask)
          return ERR_PTR(-ENOMSG);
      new_ruleset = create_ruleset(1);
      if (!IS_ERR(new_ruleset))
-        new_ruleset->fs_access_masks[0] = fs_access_mask;
+        new_ruleset->access_masks[0] = access_mask;
      return new_ruleset;
  }

@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void build_check_ruleset(void)
          .num_rules = ~0,
          .num_layers = ~0,
      };
-    typeof(ruleset.fs_access_masks[0]) fs_access_mask = ~0;
+    typeof(ruleset.access_masks[0]) fs_access_mask = ~0;

      BUILD_BUG_ON(ruleset.num_rules < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_RULES);
      BUILD_BUG_ON(ruleset.num_layers < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_LAYERS);
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
          err = -EINVAL;
          goto out_unlock;
      }
-    dst->fs_access_masks[dst->num_layers - 1] = src->fs_access_masks[0];
+    dst->access_masks[dst->num_layers - 1] = src->access_masks[0];

      /* Merges the @src tree. */
      rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(walker_rule, next_rule,
@@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ static int inherit_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
          goto out_unlock;
      }
      /* Copies the parent layer stack and leaves a space for the new layer. */
-    memcpy(child->fs_access_masks, parent->fs_access_masks,
-            flex_array_size(parent, fs_access_masks, parent->num_layers));
+    memcpy(child->access_masks, parent->access_masks,
+            flex_array_size(parent, access_masks, parent->num_layers));

      if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!parent->hierarchy)) {
          err = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
index 2d3ed7ec5a0a..32d90ce72428 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
           * section.  This is only used by
           * landlock_put_ruleset_deferred() when @usage reaches zero.
           * The fields @lock, @usage, @num_rules, @num_layers and
-         * @fs_access_masks are then unused.
+         * @access_masks are then unused.
           */
          struct work_struct work_free;
          struct {
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
               */
              u32 num_layers;
              /**
-             * @fs_access_masks: Contains the subset of filesystem
+             * @access_masks: Contains the subset of filesystem
               * actions that are restricted by a ruleset.  A domain
               * saves all layers of merged rulesets in a stack
               * (FAM), starting from the first layer to the last
@@ -135,12 +135,12 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
               * layers are set once and never changed for the
               * lifetime of the ruleset.
               */
-            u16 fs_access_masks[];
+            u32 access_masks[];

Changing from u16 to u32 is not correct for this patch, but it would not be visible with access_mask_t anyway.

          };
      };
  };

-struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 fs_access_mask);
+struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 access_mask);

  void landlock_put_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset);
  void landlock_put_ruleset_deferred(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset);
diff --git a/security/landlock/syscalls.c b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
index 32396962f04d..f1d86311df7e 100644
--- a/security/landlock/syscalls.c
+++ b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(landlock_add_rule,
      }
      /*
       * Checks that allowed_access matches the @ruleset constraints
-     * (ruleset->fs_access_masks[0] is automatically upgraded to 64-bits).
+     * (ruleset->access_masks[0] is automatically upgraded to 64-bits).
       */
-    if ((path_beneath_attr.allowed_access | ruleset->fs_access_masks[0]) !=
-            ruleset->fs_access_masks[0]) {
+    if ((path_beneath_attr.allowed_access | ruleset->access_masks[0]) !=
+            ruleset->access_masks[0]) {
          err = -EINVAL;
          goto out_put_ruleset;
      }
--
2.25.1

.



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux