On 09/03/2022 14:44, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
Currently Landlock supports filesystem
restrictions. To support network type rules,
this modification extends and renames
ruleset's access masks.
Please use 72 columns for all commit messages.
With vim: set tw=72
The code looks good but you'll have to rebase it on top of my
access_mask_t changes.
Next time you can rebase your changes on my landlock-wip branch at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mic/linux.git
I'll update this branch regularly but it should not impact much your
changes.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v3:
* Split commit.
---
security/landlock/fs.c | 4 ++--
security/landlock/ruleset.c | 18 +++++++++---------
security/landlock/ruleset.h | 8 ++++----
security/landlock/syscalls.c | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
index 97b8e421f617..d727bdab7840 100644
--- a/security/landlock/fs.c
+++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int landlock_append_fs_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
return -EINVAL;
/* Transforms relative access rights to absolute ones. */
- access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS & ~ruleset->fs_access_masks[0];
+ access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS & ~ruleset->access_masks[0];
object = get_inode_object(d_backing_inode(path->dentry));
if (IS_ERR(object))
return PTR_ERR(object);
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
/* Saves all layers handling a subset of requested accesses. */
layer_mask = 0;
for (i = 0; i < domain->num_layers; i++) {
- if (domain->fs_access_masks[i] & access_request)
+ if (domain->access_masks[i] & access_request)
layer_mask |= BIT_ULL(i);
}
/* An access request not handled by the domain is allowed. */
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
index ec72b9262bf3..78341a0538de 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
{
struct landlock_ruleset *new_ruleset;
- new_ruleset = kzalloc(struct_size(new_ruleset, fs_access_masks,
+ new_ruleset = kzalloc(struct_size(new_ruleset, access_masks,
num_layers), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!new_ruleset)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
@@ -39,21 +39,21 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers)
/*
* hierarchy = NULL
* num_rules = 0
- * fs_access_masks[] = 0
+ * access_masks[] = 0
*/
return new_ruleset;
}
-struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 fs_access_mask)
+struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 access_mask)
{
struct landlock_ruleset *new_ruleset;
/* Informs about useless ruleset. */
- if (!fs_access_mask)
+ if (!access_mask)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMSG);
new_ruleset = create_ruleset(1);
if (!IS_ERR(new_ruleset))
- new_ruleset->fs_access_masks[0] = fs_access_mask;
+ new_ruleset->access_masks[0] = access_mask;
return new_ruleset;
}
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void build_check_ruleset(void)
.num_rules = ~0,
.num_layers = ~0,
};
- typeof(ruleset.fs_access_masks[0]) fs_access_mask = ~0;
+ typeof(ruleset.access_masks[0]) fs_access_mask = ~0;
BUILD_BUG_ON(ruleset.num_rules < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_RULES);
BUILD_BUG_ON(ruleset.num_layers < LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_LAYERS);
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
- dst->fs_access_masks[dst->num_layers - 1] = src->fs_access_masks[0];
+ dst->access_masks[dst->num_layers - 1] = src->access_masks[0];
/* Merges the @src tree. */
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(walker_rule, next_rule,
@@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ static int inherit_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
goto out_unlock;
}
/* Copies the parent layer stack and leaves a space for the new layer. */
- memcpy(child->fs_access_masks, parent->fs_access_masks,
- flex_array_size(parent, fs_access_masks, parent->num_layers));
+ memcpy(child->access_masks, parent->access_masks,
+ flex_array_size(parent, access_masks, parent->num_layers));
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!parent->hierarchy)) {
err = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
index 2d3ed7ec5a0a..32d90ce72428 100644
--- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
+++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
* section. This is only used by
* landlock_put_ruleset_deferred() when @usage reaches zero.
* The fields @lock, @usage, @num_rules, @num_layers and
- * @fs_access_masks are then unused.
+ * @access_masks are then unused.
*/
struct work_struct work_free;
struct {
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
*/
u32 num_layers;
/**
- * @fs_access_masks: Contains the subset of filesystem
+ * @access_masks: Contains the subset of filesystem
* actions that are restricted by a ruleset. A domain
* saves all layers of merged rulesets in a stack
* (FAM), starting from the first layer to the last
@@ -135,12 +135,12 @@ struct landlock_ruleset {
* layers are set once and never changed for the
* lifetime of the ruleset.
*/
- u16 fs_access_masks[];
+ u32 access_masks[];
Changing from u16 to u32 is not correct for this patch, but it would not
be visible with access_mask_t anyway.
};
};
};
-struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 fs_access_mask);
+struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 access_mask);
void landlock_put_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset);
void landlock_put_ruleset_deferred(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset);
diff --git a/security/landlock/syscalls.c b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
index 32396962f04d..f1d86311df7e 100644
--- a/security/landlock/syscalls.c
+++ b/security/landlock/syscalls.c
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(landlock_add_rule,
}
/*
* Checks that allowed_access matches the @ruleset constraints
- * (ruleset->fs_access_masks[0] is automatically upgraded to 64-bits).
+ * (ruleset->access_masks[0] is automatically upgraded to 64-bits).
*/
- if ((path_beneath_attr.allowed_access | ruleset->fs_access_masks[0]) !=
- ruleset->fs_access_masks[0]) {
+ if ((path_beneath_attr.allowed_access | ruleset->access_masks[0]) !=
+ ruleset->access_masks[0]) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_put_ruleset;
}
--
2.25.1
