On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 08:15:17PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:07:40PM +0800, Firo Yang wrote: > > Our customer reported a following issue: > > If '--concurrent' was passed to ebtables command behind other arguments, > > '--concurrent' will not take effect sometimes; for a simple example, > > ebtables -L --concurrent. This is becuase the handling of '--concurrent' > > is implemented in a passing-order-dependent way. > > > > So we can fix this problem by processing it before other arguments. > > Would you instead make a patch to spew an error if --concurrent is the > first argument? Wrong wording: Would you instead make a patch to spew an error if --concurrent is _not_ the first argument? > --concurrent has never worked unless you place it in first place > anyway.
