Re: [PATCH 1/2] ebtables: processing '--concurrent' beofore other arguments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:07:40PM +0800, Firo Yang wrote:
> Our customer reported a following issue:
> If '--concurrent' was passed to ebtables command behind other arguments,
> '--concurrent' will not take effect sometimes; for a simple example,
> ebtables -L --concurrent. This is becuase the handling of '--concurrent'
> is implemented in a passing-order-dependent way.
> So we can fix this problem by processing it before other arguments.

Would you instead make a patch to spew an error if --concurrent is the
first argument?

--concurrent has never worked unless you place it in first place

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux