Hi, On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:07:40PM +0800, Firo Yang wrote: > Our customer reported a following issue: > If '--concurrent' was passed to ebtables command behind other arguments, > '--concurrent' will not take effect sometimes; for a simple example, > ebtables -L --concurrent. This is becuase the handling of '--concurrent' > is implemented in a passing-order-dependent way. > > So we can fix this problem by processing it before other arguments. Would you instead make a patch to spew an error if --concurrent is the first argument? --concurrent has never worked unless you place it in first place anyway.
