Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Florian, > > Thank you! > So, I need to fix nft and support that syntax? That would be one way. The other is to fix the != translation to use binary logic (the example i gave). > Do I understand correctly, that the same issue for state flags like > "established, related, ..."? Yes and no. A connection can't be both established and related at the same time, so anonymous set will work in that case.
