On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 05:31:02PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 05:28:50PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > [...] > > Makes sense. Thanks a lot for explaining. Probably you can include > > this in the commit description for the record. > > > > > I realize the test case is not quite effective, ruleset should be > > > emptied upon each iteration of concurrent restore job startup. > > > > Please, update the test and revamp. > > I pushed the commit already when you wrote "LGTM" in your first reply, > sorry. Yet to cover for the above, I just submitted a patch which adds a > bit of documentation to the test case (apart from improving its > effectiveness). No problem. Thanks for following up.
