On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 05:28:50PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: [...] > Makes sense. Thanks a lot for explaining. Probably you can include > this in the commit description for the record. > > > I realize the test case is not quite effective, ruleset should be > > emptied upon each iteration of concurrent restore job startup. > > Please, update the test and revamp. I pushed the commit already when you wrote "LGTM" in your first reply, sorry. Yet to cover for the above, I just submitted a patch which adds a bit of documentation to the test case (apart from improving its effectiveness). Cheers, Phil
