On 2020-06-15 04:44, Florian Westphal wrote:
Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
dwilder <dwilder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Since the netns core already does an unconditional synchronize_rcu after
> > the pre_exit hooks this would avoid the problem as well.
>
> Something like this? (un-tested)
Yes.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
> b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
> index bb9266ea3785..0d448e4d5213 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
> @@ -100,15 +100,26 @@ static int __net_init iptable_mangle_table_init(struct
> net *net)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void __net_exit iptable_mangle_net_pre_exit(struct net *net)
> +{
> + struct xt_table *table = net->ipv4.iptable_mangle;
> +
> + if (mangle_ops)
> + nf_unregister_net_hooks(net, mangle_ops,
> + hweight32(table->valid_hooks));
> +}
You probably need if (table) here, not mangle_ops.
I'm not sure if it makes sense to add a new
xt_unregister_table_hook() helper, I guess one would have to try
and see if that reduces copy&paste programming or not.
> static void __net_exit iptable_mangle_net_exit(struct net *net)
> {
> if (!net->ipv4.iptable_mangle)
> return;
> - ipt_unregister_table(net, net->ipv4.iptable_mangle, mangle_ops);
> + ipt_unregister_table(net, net->ipv4.iptable_mangle, NULL);
I guess the 3rd arg could be removed from the helper.
But yes, this looks like what I had in mind.
Will there be a followup? Otherwise I will place this on my todo-list.
Thanks.
Hi Florian
I am working on a patch. Will post soon. Sorry for the delay.