On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 09:36:28PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Albeit a bit too enthusiastic, gcc is right in that these strings may be > > truncated since the destination buffer is smaller than the source one. > > Get rid of the warnings (and the potential problem) by specifying a > > string "precision" of one character less than the destination. This > > ensures a terminating nul-character may be written as well. > > Fernando sent a patch for this already, with the notable difference > of altering the size of the destination buffer by one. Ah, thanks! I missed it. Replied to it pointing at my patch, also spotted a typo in his patch. :) Cheers, Phil
