Re: [PATCH nft] src: osf: fix snprintf -Wformat-truncation warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Fernando,

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 01:01:46PM +0200, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> Fedora 30 uses very recent gcc (version 9.1.1 20190503 (Red Hat 9.1.1-1)),
> osf produces following warnings:
> 
> -Wformat-truncation warning have been introduced in the version 7.1 of gcc.
> Also, remove a unneeded address check of "tmp + 1" in nf_osf_strchr().
> 
> nfnl_osf.c: In function ‘nfnl_osf_load_fingerprints’:
> nfnl_osf.c:292:39: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing
> up to 1023 bytes into a region of size 128 [-Wformat-truncation=]
>   292 |   cnt = snprintf(obuf, sizeof(obuf), "%s,", pbeg);
>       |                                       ^~
> nfnl_osf.c:292:9: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 2 and 1025 bytes into a
> destination of size 128
>   292 |   cnt = snprintf(obuf, sizeof(obuf), "%s,", pbeg);
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> nfnl_osf.c:302:46: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing
> up to 1023 bytes into a region of size 32 [-Wformat-truncation=]
>   302 |    cnt = snprintf(f.genre, sizeof(f.genre), "%s", pbeg);
>       |                                              ^~
> nfnl_osf.c:302:10: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 1 and 1024 bytes into a
> destination of size 32
>   302 |    cnt = snprintf(f.genre, sizeof(f.genre), "%s", pbeg);
>       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> nfnl_osf.c:309:49: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing
> up to 1023 bytes into a region of size 32 [-Wformat-truncation=]
>   309 |   cnt = snprintf(f.version, sizeof(f.version), "%s", pbeg);
>       |                                                 ^~
> nfnl_osf.c:309:9: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 1 and 1024 bytes into a
> destination of size 32
>   309 |   cnt = snprintf(f.version, sizeof(f.version), "%s", pbeg);
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> nfnl_osf.c:317:47: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing
> up to 1023 bytes into a region of size 32 [-Wformat-truncation=]
>   317 |       snprintf(f.subtype, sizeof(f.subtype), "%s", pbeg);
>       |                                               ^~
> nfnl_osf.c:317:7: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 1 and 1024 bytes into a
> destination of size 32
>   317 |       snprintf(f.subtype, sizeof(f.subtype), "%s", pbeg);
>       |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Reported-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/nfnl_osf.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/nfnl_osf.c b/src/nfnl_osf.c
> index be3fd81..c99f8f3 100644
> --- a/src/nfnl_osf.c
> +++ b/src/nfnl_osf.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static char *nf_osf_strchr(char *ptr, char c)
>  	if (tmp)
>  		*tmp = '\0';
>  
> -	while (tmp && tmp + 1 && isspace(*(tmp + 1)))
> +	while (tmp && isspace(*(tmp + 1)))
>  		tmp++;
>  
>  	return tmp;
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int osf_load_line(char *buffer, int len, int del,
>  			 struct netlink_ctx *ctx)
>  {
>  	int i, cnt = 0;
> -	char obuf[MAXOPTSTRLEN];
> +	char obuf[MAXOPTSTRLEN + 1];
>  	struct nf_osf_user_finger f;
>  	char *pbeg, *pend;
>  	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static int osf_load_line(char *buffer, int len, int del,
>  	pend = nf_osf_strchr(pbeg, OSFPDEL);
>  	if (pend) {
>  		*pend = '\0';
> -		cnt = snprintf(obuf, sizeof(obuf), "%s,", pbeg);
> +		cnt = snprintf(obuf, sizeof(obuf), "%.128s", pbeg);

Not a big deal, but sizeof() and hard-coding the "precision" doesn't mix
well in my opinion. I've solved this like so:

		i = sizeof(obuf);
		cnt = snprintf(obuf, i, "%.*s,", i - 2, pbeg);

(i - 2) to leave space for the trailing comma and nul-char. Also note
that your patch drops the trailing comma, I guess that's a bug.

Maybe you want to have a look at my patch (Message-ID
20190720185226.8876-2-phil@xxxxxx) and incorporate what's useful into
yours? It's your code, so you should know better how to fix things. :)

Thanks, Phil



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux