On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Could we maybe find a middle ground where nft still does these
> > optimizations but prints warnings so users are notified? We might even
> > introduce -W flag to customize behaviour (-W all (default), -W error
> > (strict mode), -W none (suppress any non-fatal output on stderr)).
>
> I like this proposal.
>
> One of the broken tproxy test cases (it prints warning) does this:
>
> ip daddr 0.0.0.0/0
Yes, sorry, that's my fault.
> .. and that is always true and could be removed.
> Different "problem" of course, but it shows that there is ample
> opportunity for pruning irrelevant expressions.
>
> And breaking scripts every time we decide that something is
> "silly" is a bad decision, imo.
Agreed, this case is slightly bit corner case as they should _not_ be
doing enclosing single element in brackets in their scripts. But I get
your point, better adopt a more conservative approach ;-)
> I suspect users will complain about { 1.2.3.4 } being illegal
> "just because".
I'll explore the warning idea, it can be an initial step before we can
fully disallow this, so users don't complain about sudden breakage :-)
Thanks for your feedback!
