On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 06:21:00PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:13:44AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > > Mark fall through cases as such. Note that correctness of those fall > > throughs have not been verified. > > Applied, thanks. > > BTW, do we need to update any Makefile to include a new -W option for > gcc to check for missing "fall through"? TBH, I have no idea. :) I use gcc-8.2.0 here and it emitted the warnings by default. Maybe with older versions you need -Wimplicit-fallthrough to see them? Cheers, Phil
