Re: [PATCH nft] evaluate: increase set key size if needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> this makes following failing test case work:
>   ip6 dscp vmap { 0x04, ..
> 
> problem was that the 6bit dscp value spans a byte boundary,
> so payload postprocessing increases the size to a 2 byte access
> (plus a binop mask operation to discard the unwanted bits).
> 
> But because set key size was already set based on the previous
> payload size, we get a set with a keysize of 1 that is then
> populated with keys of size 2 (which causes a kernel error).
> 
> So, fixup the set size so kernel is told to expect 2-byte keys
> in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
> index d224f0f3c2c1..a1193f7d8456 100644
> --- a/src/evaluate.c
> +++ b/src/evaluate.c
> @@ -1279,6 +1279,8 @@ static int expr_evaluate_map(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct expr **expr)
>  		if (expr_evaluate(ctx, &map->mappings->set->init) < 0)
>  			return -1;
>  		expr_set_context(&ctx->ectx, ctx->set->key->dtype, ctx->set->key->len);
> +		if (ctx->set->key->len < map->left->len)
> +			ctx->set->key->len = map->left->len;

Will this work with concatenations?

>  		if (binop_transfer(ctx, expr) < 0)
>  			return -1;
>  
> -- 
> 2.16.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux