On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 10:28:28PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:01:54PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c
> > index a1a07b338ccf..0f7255cc65ee 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.c
> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static const struct nf_hook_ops nf_nat_ipv4_ops[] = {
> > {
> > .hook = iptable_nat_ipv4_in,
> > .pf = NFPROTO_IPV4,
> > + .nat_hook = true,
>
> Just a suggestion: This nat_hook basically means that we only allow
> this hook to be a singleton in this spot. So I would call it like
> this, ie. singleton, given we have no NAT semantics in the netfilter
> core.
Hm, never mind about names.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
