Re: nftables: lockout with 0008split_tables_0 test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 November 2017 at 19:39, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
<arturo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 21 November 2017 at 18:09, Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, thats expected.
>> First ssh base chain gets invoked, which accepts any packet
>> either by verdict or policy.
>>
>> Then next base chain gets consulted which drops the packet.
>>
>> I would suggest to either swap the policies or duplicate the ssh
>> rule into the input chain too.
>
> This is something which is actually confusing our users.
> I just took the time to extend a bit the documentation:
>
> https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Configuring_chains
>
> Of course, feel free to edit the docs :-)

Unrelated, but I would like to mention other thing that lacks
documentation: the interaction of packet flows between families/hooks

* Does a packet traversing a chain in the ip family traverse again
chains in the inet family? Same the other way around
* Does a packet accepted in the netdev/ingress family/hook gets
evaluated again in ip/ip6/inet families/hooks?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux