On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:43:02PM +0200, Eric Leblond wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/cli.h b/include/cli.h
> index e577400..899c8a6 100644
> --- a/include/cli.h
> +++ b/include/cli.h
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> struct parser_state;
> #ifdef HAVE_LIBREADLINE
> extern int cli_init(struct nft_ctx *nft, struct mnl_socket *nf_sock,
> - struct nft_cache *cache, struct parser_state *state);
> + struct parser_state *state);
One could get rid of nf_sock parameter as well since that resides in
nft_ctx, too.
[...]
> diff --git a/src/cli.c b/src/cli.c
> index 7501b29..fd5c7b7 100644
> --- a/src/cli.c
> +++ b/src/cli.c
> @@ -177,13 +177,17 @@ void __fmtstring(1, 0) cli_display(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
> }
>
> int cli_init(struct nft_ctx *nft, struct mnl_socket *nf_sock,
> - struct nft_cache *cache, struct parser_state *_state)
> + struct parser_state *_state)
> {
> const char *home;
> + struct nft_cache cache;
> +
> + memset(&cache, 0, sizeof(cache));
> + init_list_head(&cache.list);
Is this a leftover, or do you intentionally use a new cache instance
instead of nft->cache?
Cheers, Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
