On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> The commit ab8bc7ed864b9c4f1fcb00a22bbe4e0f66ce8003
> ("netfilter: remove nf_ct_is_untracked")
> changed the line
> if (ct && !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct) && nfct_nat(ct)) {
> to
> if (ct && nfct_nat(ct)) {
>
> meanwhile, the commit 41390895e50bc4f28abe384c6b35ac27464a20ec
> ("netfilter: ipvs: don't check for presence of nat extension")
> from ipvs-next had changed the same line to
>
> if (ct && !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct) && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK)) {
>
> When ipvs-next got merged into nf-next, the merge resolution took
> the first version, dropping the conversion of nfct_nat().
>
> While this doesn't cause a problem at the moment, it will once we stop
> adding the nat extension by default.
Also applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
