The commit ab8bc7ed864b9c4f1fcb00a22bbe4e0f66ce8003
("netfilter: remove nf_ct_is_untracked")
changed the line
if (ct && !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct) && nfct_nat(ct)) {
to
if (ct && nfct_nat(ct)) {
meanwhile, the commit 41390895e50bc4f28abe384c6b35ac27464a20ec
("netfilter: ipvs: don't check for presence of nat extension")
from ipvs-next had changed the same line to
if (ct && !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct) && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK)) {
When ipvs-next got merged into nf-next, the merge resolution took
the first version, dropping the conversion of nfct_nat().
While this doesn't cause a problem at the moment, it will once we stop
adding the nat extension by default.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Pablo, I prefer if this can go via nf-next rather than ipvs-next.
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
index af3a9bbdf2ae..fb780be76d15 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
@@ -260,8 +260,9 @@ static int ip_vs_ftp_out(struct ip_vs_app *app, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
buf_len = strlen(buf);
ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
- if (ct && nfct_nat(ct)) {
+ if (ct && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK)) {
bool mangled;
+
/* If mangling fails this function will return 0
* which will cause the packet to be dropped.
* Mangling can only fail under memory pressure,
--
2.10.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
