On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Josh Hunt wrote: > > Thinking over it I understand better your approach: replace > > IPSET_ATTR_NETMASK with IPSET_ATTR_NETMASK_MASK completely and keeping > > the former for backward compatibility reasons only. What I propose is > > able to maintain syntax-compatibility in the sense that what is passed > > to the kernel as cidr/netmask can be saved from there in the same > > syntax. > > I have not gone through all of your comments yet, but my intention was > to make sure that if cidrs are used they are presented the same way they > are today (prior to my patches.) If a user uses the new full netmask > support then that is what is shown. This way we stay consistent with > whatever the user inputs at create time. Yes, you are right, some conversion confused me. Best regards, Jozsef - E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
