On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:29:33AM +0900, Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA wrote: > > Hi, Pablo > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:48:09PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > So you want to check if the addresses mismatch, so we infer from there > > > if there is NAT or not when status bits are not available. > > > > > > Are you trying to catch up some case in netlink event specifically? > > > > It's nothing. My skimping test for lnfct binding for another languate > > which set only ATTR_REPL_IPV4DST then get NFCT_GOPT_IS_NAT was success, > > but it fails now. > > I see, we should restore the original behaviour, I think your patch is > correct then. JFYI: I have applied this patch, thanks for explaining. BTW, it would be great if you can add some short description to your follow up patch. If English is a concern, don't bother much about it, we're non-native speaker mostly :) Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
