Re: [PATCH V3] audit: normalize NETFILTER_PKT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask again, how does
> >> > userspace distinguish between an unset nfmark and a nfmark of
> >> > 0xffffffff?
> >>
> >> It can't.
> >
> > It can if you log it as 0, as I asked in patch 1 review.
> >
> > (You wouldn't log sk uid of 0 as -1 either, would you?)
> 
> I want to see the code able to handle the full range of nfmark values
> as well as the unset case; if that means we need to tweak userspace a
> bit, please work with Steve on that.

There is no 'unset nfmark'.  Its just a 32bit integer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux