On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2017-03-02 19:16, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 2017-03-01 17:19, Paul Moore wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > On 2017-02-28 17:22, Paul Moore wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> > Eliminate flipping in and out of message fields, dropping fields in the process. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Sample raw message format IPv4 UDP: >> >> >> > type=NETFILTER_PKT msg=audit(1487874761.386:228): mark=0xae8a2732 saddr=127.0.0.1 daddr=127.0.0.1 proto=17^] >> >> >> > Sample raw message format IPv6 ICMP6: >> >> >> > type=NETFILTER_PKT msg=audit(1487874761.381:227): mark=0x223894b7 saddr=::1 daddr=::1 proto=58^] >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Issue: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/11 >> >> >> > Test case: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/issues/43 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> > --- >> >> >> > net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c | 122 ++++++++++----------------------------------- >> >> >> > 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c b/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c >> >> >> > index 4973cbd..945fa29 100644 >> >> >> > --- a/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c >> >> >> > +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c >> >> >> > @@ -31,146 +31,78 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("ip6t_AUDIT"); ... >> >> >> > static unsigned int >> >> >> > audit_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par) >> >> >> > { >> >> >> > - const struct xt_audit_info *info = par->targinfo; >> >> >> > struct audit_buffer *ab; >> >> >> > + int fam = -1; >> >> >> > >> >> >> > if (audit_enabled == 0) >> >> >> > goto errout; >> >> >> > - >> >> >> > ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT); >> >> >> > if (ab == NULL) >> >> >> > goto errout; >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - audit_log_format(ab, "action=%hhu hook=%u len=%u inif=%s outif=%s", >> >> >> > - info->type, par->hooknum, skb->len, >> >> >> > - par->in ? par->in->name : "?", >> >> >> > - par->out ? par->out->name : "?"); >> >> >> > - >> >> >> > - if (skb->mark) >> >> >> > - audit_log_format(ab, " mark=%#x", skb->mark); >> >> >> > - >> >> >> > - if (skb->dev && skb->dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER) { >> >> >> > - audit_log_format(ab, " smac=%pM dmac=%pM macproto=0x%04x", >> >> >> > - eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest, >> >> >> > - ntohs(eth_hdr(skb)->h_proto)); >> >> >> > + audit_log_format(ab, "mark=%#x", skb->mark ?: -1); >> >> >> >> >> >> How do Steve's userspace tools like the unset/-1 value represented >> >> >> when it is a hex value: -1 or 0xffffffff? >> >> > >> >> > My understanding is they are set up to cope with this. >> >> >> >> How does userspace distinguish between an unset nfmark and a nfmark of >> >> 0xffffffff? >> > >> > It never had to deal specifically with nfmark previously because it >> > wasn't included if it was blank. Generally other values that are -1 are >> > interpreted by the audit userspace tools as unset (session id, auid, >> > etc...) >> >> Yes, I know, let me get straight to the point: should we use "mark=-1" >> when the nfmark is unset instead of "mark=0xffffffff"? > > I'd prefer to keep the format as it was, explicitly labelled hex. The > other fields that are printed as unset, -1, come out in the logs as > MAX_UINT: "auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295", so I don't see any reason to > change that convention. Once that field is known by userspace tools, > they can interpret (-i) that as -1. Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask again, how does userspace distinguish between an unset nfmark and a nfmark of 0xffffffff? -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
