Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > However, changing test to if (iph->frag_off) return -NF_ACCEPT seems > > wrong too because we have enough info to track. OTOH, this only happens > > with HDRINCL+raw socket so perhaps we shouldn't care about this and > > just change ipv4 l3 tracker to ignore all packets w. iph->frag_off set. > > Florian, unless you rise your hand, I'm going to take this patch so we > at least fix splats here. I still have the impression that this > setsockopt() option and its interaction with netfilter is broken at > many levels. Hmmm, I think we should disable tracking of all fragmented packets, or at least disable NAT of all fragmented packets. If we NAT 1st packet only then frag reasm won't complete anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
