Re: [PATCH iptables 1/2] xshared: do not lock again and again if "-w" option is not specified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 09:57:34PM +0800, Liping Zhang wrote:
> From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> After running the following commands, some confusing messages was printed
> out:
>   # while : ; do
>   iptables -A INPUT &
>   iptables -D INPUT &
>   done
>   [...]
>   Another app is currently holding the xtables lock; still -9s 0us time
>   ahead to have a chance to grab the lock...
>   Another app is currently holding the xtables lock; still -29s 0us time
>   ahead to have a chance to grab the lock...
> 
> If "-w" option is not specified, the "wait" will be zero, so we should
> check whether the timer_left is less than wait_interval before we call
> select to sleep.
> 
> Also remove unused "BASE_MICROSECONDS" and "struct timeval waited_time"
> introduced by commit e8f857a5a151 ("xtables: Add an interval option for
> xtables lock wait").

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux