[PATCH iptables 1/2] xshared: do not lock again and again if "-w" option is not specified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@xxxxxxxxx>

After running the following commands, some confusing messages was printed
out:
  # while : ; do
  iptables -A INPUT &
  iptables -D INPUT &
  done
  [...]
  Another app is currently holding the xtables lock; still -9s 0us time
  ahead to have a chance to grab the lock...
  Another app is currently holding the xtables lock; still -29s 0us time
  ahead to have a chance to grab the lock...

If "-w" option is not specified, the "wait" will be zero, so we should
check whether the timer_left is less than wait_interval before we call
select to sleep.

Also remove unused "BASE_MICROSECONDS" and "struct timeval waited_time"
introduced by commit e8f857a5a151 ("xtables: Add an interval option for
xtables lock wait").

Fixes: e8f857a5a151 ("xtables: Add an interval option for xtables lock wait")
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 iptables/xshared.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/iptables/xshared.c b/iptables/xshared.c
index cccb8ae..055acf2 100644
--- a/iptables/xshared.c
+++ b/iptables/xshared.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
 #include "xshared.h"
 
 #define XT_LOCK_NAME	"/run/xtables.lock"
-#define BASE_MICROSECONDS	100000
 
 /*
  * Print out any special helps. A user might like to be able to add a --help
@@ -249,13 +248,11 @@ void xs_init_match(struct xtables_match *match)
 
 bool xtables_lock(int wait, struct timeval *wait_interval)
 {
-	struct timeval time_left, wait_time, waited_time;
+	struct timeval time_left, wait_time;
 	int fd, i = 0;
 
 	time_left.tv_sec = wait;
 	time_left.tv_usec = 0;
-	waited_time.tv_sec = 0;
-	waited_time.tv_usec = 0;
 
 	fd = open(XT_LOCK_NAME, O_CREAT, 0600);
 	if (fd < 0)
@@ -264,6 +261,9 @@ bool xtables_lock(int wait, struct timeval *wait_interval)
 	while (1) {
 		if (flock(fd, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB) == 0)
 			return true;
+		else if (wait >= 0 && timercmp(&time_left, wait_interval, <))
+			return false;
+
 		if (++i % 10 == 0) {
 			if (wait != -1)
 				fprintf(stderr, "Another app is currently holding the xtables lock; "
@@ -279,10 +279,7 @@ bool xtables_lock(int wait, struct timeval *wait_interval)
 		if (wait == -1)
 			continue;
 
-		timeradd(&waited_time, wait_interval, &waited_time);
 		timersub(&time_left, wait_interval, &time_left);
-		if (!timerisset(&time_left))
-			return false;
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.5.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux