Hi Pablo, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Feng Gao <gfree.wind@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:06:51PM +0800, Feng Gao wrote: >> > How about this patch ? >> >> Is this a theoretical problem? I would really prefer if you do your >> work to collect traces that show that the actual sequence adjustment >> is not correct. >> >> > I think it should be one bug of seqadjust. >> >> "I think this is a bug" is not sufficient, I expect you prove this is >> not correct. > > > Yes. Now I only analyze it by codes, and it should check ack flag in theory. > Because TCP REST could not contain ack. > > But I will set up one environment and generate the packet trace. > > Regards > Feng > I have gotten the packet trace which shows seqadj adjusts the 0 ack value, and sent the v3 patch which contains the reproduce steps, packet trace, and logs. Best Regards Feng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
