Re: [PATCH nft] evaluate: fix "list set" unexpected behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:51:17AM +0200, Pablo M. Bermudo Garay wrote:
> Special sets like maps and flow tables have their own commands to be
> listed and inspected.
> 
> Before this patch, "nft list set" was able to display these special sets
> content:
> 
>   # nft list set filter test
>   table ip filter {
>           map test {
>                   type ipv4_addr : inet_service
>                   elements = { 192.168.1.101 : http-alt}
>           }
>   }
> 
> Now an error is shown:
> 
>   # nft list set filter test
>   <cmdline>:1:1-20: Error: Could not process rule: Set 'test' does not exist
>   list set filter test
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pablo M. Bermudo Garay <pablombg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/evaluate.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
> index 423523f..86884a2 100644
> --- a/src/evaluate.c
> +++ b/src/evaluate.c
> @@ -2674,7 +2674,9 @@ static int cmd_evaluate_list(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct cmd *cmd)
>  		if (table == NULL)
>  			return cmd_error(ctx, "Could not process rule: Table '%s' does not exist",
>  					 cmd->handle.table);
> -		if (set_lookup(table, cmd->handle.set) == NULL)
> +		set = set_lookup(table, cmd->handle.set);
> +		if (set == NULL || set->flags & SET_F_MAP ||
> +		    set->flags & SET_F_EVAL)

I'd suggest:

                    set == NULL && set->flags & (SET_F_EVAL | SET_F_MAP)

>  			return cmd_error(ctx, "Could not process rule: Set '%s' does not exist",
>  					 cmd->handle.set);
>  		return 0;
> -- 
> 2.8.3
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux