Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 06:14:26PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
> > index 25998fa..4ec1cea 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ struct nft_ct {
> > enum nft_registers dreg:8;
> > enum nft_registers sreg:8;
> > };
> > + union {
> > + u8 set_bit;
> > + } imm;
> > + unsigned int imm_len:8;
> > + struct nft_data immediate;
>
> Could you use select_ops() so we don't increase the size of nft_ct for
> other users?
Sure.
I'd split this into nft_ct (sreg/dreg)
and nft_ct_set_imm (set from immediate).
Does that sound okay?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
