On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:17:07PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think this should fit into the grammar that I'm proposing above with > > > no shift/reduce conflicts, ie. > > > > > > ct packets VALUE > > > ct direction original packets VALUE > > > ct direction reply packets VALUE > > > > I'll have to check. I don't want to add any new keywords to the lexer > > since that creates more problems for the grammar. > > Drats, it doesn't work. > conflicts: 1 shift/reduce Right, the parser doesn't know if it has to reduce ct direction original as simple expression, or keep shifting for more tokens. > 'ct direction' is already a valid expression, it loads > CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo). > > I'll send what I have in a second, but its not great either. Wait for it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
