Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think this should fit into the grammar that I'm proposing above with > > no shift/reduce conflicts, ie. > > > > ct packets VALUE > > ct direction original packets VALUE > > ct direction reply packets VALUE > > I'll have to check. I don't want to add any new keywords to the lexer > since that creates more problems for the grammar. Drats, it doesn't work. conflicts: 1 shift/reduce 'ct direction' is already a valid expression, it loads CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo). I'll send what I have in a second, but its not great either. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
