Re: [PATCH libmnl 1/2] socket: introduce mnl_socket_open2()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 2015-10-05 20:14, Guillaume Nault wrote:
>> 
>> I think this breaks library ABI: you should introduce a new revision 
>> instead.
>> 
>AFAIK, this revision hasn't been part of any official release yet.
>That's why I've exported mnl_socket_open2() there. I don't mind
>incrementing the ABI version, but should we really do that for every
>commit exporting a new function between two releases?

Not for every commit, indeed no. That would lead to a needlessy
larger (and deeper) symvers DAG, and therefore more to process for
dynamic and runtime linkers. Not much, but it would pile up
for x->\infty. This is also why the entire DAG should be flattened
again when setting -version-info C:R:A back to a new *:0:0.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux