Am 13.03.2015 um 14:01 schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:31:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> The netlink portid is an unsigned integer, use this type
>> also in netfilter.
>
> This small cleanup I can still take it but...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c | 4 ++--
>> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue_core.c | 7 ++++---
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
>> index 11d85b3..7f00846 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct nfulnl_instance {
>> struct timer_list timer;
>> struct net *net;
>> struct user_namespace *peer_user_ns; /* User namespace of the peer process */
>> - int peer_portid; /* PORTID of the peer process */
>> + unsigned int peer_portid; /* PORTID of the peer process */
>
> I think you have to use u32 for consistency. Other spots use the
> datatype for the netlink portid.
>
> I think same thing applies to other patches.
Of course! Will re-spin with u32.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
