Re: [PATCH 1/2] rhashtable: Introduce rhashtable_walk_*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:36:13PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> I really think the amount of time and effort being put into making
> the walker function properly is excessive.
> 
> Let's just say that if you want to use rhashtable, you have to use a
> linked list, or similar separate mechanism, to have stable walks of
> the entire set of objects.

I definitely agree with that :)

However, I'd really like to get these primitives in first so that
at least I can convert the existing rhashtable walkers over and
get on with implementing rhashtable rehashing which is what I set
out to do.

As otherwise we'd be looking at fixing the existing users (in
particular, nft_hash) properly which might take a lot more time.

If and when we finally fix the existing users we can always remove
these primitives.

FWIW when I first wrote this patch I called it
rhashtable_walk_dangerously, I can readopt that name if you think
that will dissuade people from using it.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux