Re: [PATCH 1/2] rhashtable: Introduce rhashtable_walk_*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:09:24AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>
> That doesn't look right to me.
> Surely you shouldn't be calling rcu_read_lock() when the mutex
> request is interrupted.
> 
> So maybe:
> 	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ht->mutex);
> 	if (err)
> 		return err;
> 	rcu_read_lock();

No, we need to grab the RCU read lock while holding the mutex
in order to prevent future resizes from happening once we release
the mutex.

We don't want to hold the mutex which would stop other walks from
starting.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux