On 01/16/15 at 07:35pm, Patrick McHardy wrote: > On 16.01, Thomas Graf wrote: > > Right,but that's a Netlink dump issue and not specific to rhashtable. > > Well, rhashtable (or generally resizing) will make it a lot worse. > Usually we at worst miss entries which were added during the dump, > which is made up by the notifications. > > With resizing we might miss anything, its completely undeterministic. > > > Putting the sequence number check in place should be sufficient > > for sets, right? > > I don't see how. The problem is that the ordering of the hash changes > and it will skip different entries than those that have already been > dumped. Since an resize can only be triggered through insert/remove you simply bump a sequence number when you insert/remove and have userspace restart the dump when NLM_F_DUMP_INTR is set. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
