On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:35:00PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:43:57AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >> > In e6f30c7 ("netfilter: x_tables: add xt_bpf match"), the internal
> >> > linux/filter.h header slipped through in the user exposed xt_bpf.h
> >> > header as included file.
> >>
> >> is that true? #include <linux/filter.h> should include
> >> include/uapi/linux/filter.h in userspace builds.
> >
> > You're right. I'm going to send a v2.
>
> Thanks for fixing my bug. I agree that it's better to do this
> independent of the sk_filter/bpf_prog patch.
>
> > We should also cache the linux/filter.h header in the iptables
> > sources, would you send a patch for that? Thanks.
>
> Will do. Should I just import the latest version of the file, or is
> there a sync policy, such as that all kernel headers come from the
> same kernel release?
Right. The kernel header which is available after make headers_install.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
