On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:43:57AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> > In e6f30c7 ("netfilter: x_tables: add xt_bpf match"), the internal
>> > linux/filter.h header slipped through in the user exposed xt_bpf.h
>> > header as included file.
>>
>> is that true? #include <linux/filter.h> should include
>> include/uapi/linux/filter.h in userspace builds.
>
> You're right. I'm going to send a v2.
Thanks for fixing my bug. I agree that it's better to do this
independent of the sk_filter/bpf_prog patch.
> We should also cache the linux/filter.h header in the iptables
> sources, would you send a patch for that? Thanks.
Will do. Should I just import the latest version of the file, or is
there a sync policy, such as that all kernel headers come from the
same kernel release?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
