Re: [ulogd PATCH 0/8] make progress ulogd_output_IPFIX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Sorry for the delay in the review.

On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 21:11 +0900, Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA wrote:
>  Hello Eric.
> 
> Thank you for taking your time to see it and your reply.
> 
> > Some generic points regarding this patchset:
> 
> I'm resending all with following it, sorry for your inconvenience
> And you wrote...
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ipfix: use nfct_bitmask
> > available on the system. As it is possible to build ulogd with
> > --disable-nfct configure flags, you need to make the build of IPFIX

I've just realized this means you won't be able to build IPFIX module if
you don't have a new version of libnetfilter_conntrack. I don't want to
dump once again the required version of the libs. So you should add a
check on nfct_bitmask in the configure.ac to be sure you will be able to
build IPFIX.

> I see. I should have seen input/Makefile.am before, thank you.
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] ipfix: add function for ipfix message creation
> > I don't like this malloc because ulogd will do an allocation for each
> 
> I think we can fix allocation sizes for each of template and I worked
> at PATCH 8/8 but you could not see it because the patches format were
> invalid, sorry.

I'm basically ok with the patchset if we omit the nfct_bitmask issue.
I've just fixed two remaining whitespace issues and I can provide you
the updated patchset if you want.

BR,
-- 
Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux