Re: [PATCH nft] expr: do not suppress OP_EQ when RHS is bitmask type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > > If an equality relation is explicitly specified by the user, it also needs
> > > > to be printed. Florian's change is all we need from what I can tell.
> > > 
> > > Then we have to document that in some cases key == value and key
> > > value are equivalent, and when it comes to flags it is not, which is
> > > still rare to me.
> > 
> > Sure. I think I already have it in my documentation. Its basically simply
> > documenting what the implicit op means in which context.
> 
> OK, please go ahead push it, thanks.

done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux