Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hmm, that would be nice. I need to think about it again, > > problem is that moving it at this time could result in > > freeing the would-be parent of the new node. > > Yeah, thats why fq_gc() is followed by a full lookup. > > In practice, the lookup done in fq_gc() brings in cpu cache all the > cache lines, and second lookup is very fast. I had wondered about this. Ok, that makes sense. I'll change it to be more like fq. Thanks for explaining this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
