On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:09:43 +0000 Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:54:22AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > On Sunday 2014-01-12 21:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > >1. Completely minor, but noted in review of both packages that the > > >COPYING file has the old fsf address in it. Would be great if you > > >could update to the new one. > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address > > > > No, best remove the address, because you really don't want to be > > updating all the time. > > "All the time" seems slightly exagerated. But the "updated" license > linked in the wiki is exactly the same version we're using, the > address hasn't been changed: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt It has: - Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA + Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc., + 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA ... and a few other diffs like saying <yeah> instead of 19xx and Lesser GNU Public License instead of Library, etc. FSF moved buildings a few years ago... as far as I know they don't plan to move again, and it's only happened once. The GPLv3 COPYING file I note doesn't have any physical address in it. ;) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
