On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:43:43PM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:33:06PM +0100, Kristian Evensen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > No, I'm refering to the (ab)use of the expression. Anything not returning > > > data is not an expression but a statement. > > > > Ok, then I follow :) I followed the naming in meta, but I agree. What > > would be a good naming convetion? I thought of something like > > nft_expr_stmt_*. It is a bit clumsy, but it is at least clear that the > > struct can be used to represent both an expression and a statement. > > nft_ct_stmt? This is what we use in nftables f.i. in case of meta. Perhaps nft_ct_instr? So we can identify this as the nftables instruction-set. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
